February 2023
Florence Aellen is the deep learning specialist at the Cognitive Computational Neuroscience Lab of the Institute of Computer Science, University of Bern. For her PhD she works with a very interdisciplinary research team to unravel interrelations between electrical brain activity and states of consciousness. Herself originally coming from a background in mathematics and theoretical physics, she now puts her computational expertise in the service of clinical applications, learning a lot in the process.
Flo(rence), can you tell us about your research?
My project is embedded within the computational platform for the Interfaculty Research Cooperation “Decoding Sleep” at the University of Bern and the Inselspital, Bern University Hospital. Apart from background methodological research, I have investigated indicators for sleep disorders and most recently have extracted positive predictive markers for coma patients out of EEG data. In our interdisciplinary team, I am responsible for data analysis via machine and deep learning.
Today, assessing the state of coma patients in critical care is very difficult, focusses mostly on negative markers, allows for inter-scorer variability, and leaves a third of patients with an unclear prognosis. We have trained deep learning models to discriminate coma survivors from non survivors. So, if the network outputs a value above a defined threshold, it is a positive indicator. Focusing on such positive markers can be a critical piece of additional information for clinicians to consider and it can help family members if they receive some positive news in such extreme situations. We are one step away from having a fully automated pipeline based on complex EEG data, which if validated on new patient cohorts and hospitals, could help to predict survival objectively and quite accurately, even for patients where this was previously difficult.
I like solving puzzles. This is an aspect I especially appreciate about coding.
Why are you using Artificial Intelligence for this?
So, for this study we have EEG data from 134 coma patients from four hospitals across Switzerland, collected within the first 24 hours after falling into a coma. Patients were presented with 20 minutes of sounds and while their brain’s processing of these sounds was recorded. This first phase of coma is critical to predict the outcome of patients. Deep learning was especially apt for these calculations because unlike machine learning for neural data it does not need to focus on a narrow aspect of the data. With it, you can explore the whole EEG response in different electrodes at the same time. It can also account for the great variation in patient EEG responses: some respond at a neural level quickly, others slowly to the presented sounds. So, deep learning can capture more patterns within the data and provide a meaningful overall picture.
How do you perceive your research environment?